|
Doc418 (July 24, 2008 at 7:59 am)
perfect,
CaptainFaisal (July 21, 2008 at 11:45 pm)
Yes sir! I've been flying with PMDG 747 and you're right about the difference between FSX default and PMDG. The thing is I rarely loose on runway centerline perfectly..thats why I feel its more challenging..
WHEELSRUP (July 21, 2008 at 4:59 pm)
Grrrrrrrrrreat video!!! Thanks for posting!!!!
HenriqueNights (July 21, 2008 at 6:36 am)
if youre using default fsx aircraft, you dont know nothing, because they arevery unreal. try to land pmdg 747-400 with visual procedure.
D001SPADE (July 16, 2008 at 5:24 am)
the difference between this and fsx is that, This, you only have on shot at keep your azz and the rest of the 300 or so real live, "fleshy" grafix behind you well intact, but uhmm u can 'always press the reset button' for a quick fix on FSX :)
CaptainFaisal (July 15, 2008 at 2:59 am)
Exactly but I don't know much about cessna and I've never flown it to JFK. I've been flying 747 and 380 for long time and I did most of the landing on runway 13L and 13R. So you can say I'm kida master on landing on runway like this including Hong Kong's Kai Tak, that's why doesn't feel so challenging. But still this challenging and I agree with you all. Thanks for all those comments.
CE750 (July 15, 2008 at 2:38 am)
What is challenging (and I've actually flown the MD11 into JFK 13L) is that it's purely visual, with no electronic glide slope, and not even a proper VASI... It's as though you're flying a Cessna 152 again, but you've got upto 491,000lbs of jet instead and the runway is rather short if you over shoot..
CaptainFaisal (July 15, 2008 at 1:17 am)
You guys are all right! This is very challenging because there's Canarsie island...
CE750 (July 14, 2008 at 10:52 pm)
I imagine you're saying that tongue in cheek, right?
jayhelldee (July 13, 2008 at 6:12 pm)
its challenging because its not FSX! |
