|
alanalan77 (April 9, 2008 at 10:25 pm)
why is the coanda effect resulting in antigravity. thats like saying the casimir effect is responsibal for bananas.
just because the avro saucer and many other ordinary flying objects use this and it sounds cool and mysterious. start reading about it, before you disinform people...
sacha4you (April 5, 2008 at 12:35 am)
marcos13af, I can't follow your post.
Yes, electrons are part of ordinary matter, they provide electrical neutrality to nucleii, make chemistry possible, and, never decay. However 'solvent of matter' is a strange idea. E.g. in a plasma (4th state of matter) nucleii can be separated from their electrons. However no subatomic particle can be absorbed easily by a nucleus. There are things like Coulomb barrier and Pauli's exclusion principle. You have to do violent things to overcome that. ;-))
marcos13af (April 4, 2008 at 11:57 pm)
Electrons are the solvent of mater...they are involved in all phases of mater(Solid,Liquid and Gaseous)...they have a crucial importance...they easily can fly free...other subatomic particle can be absorbed by a nucleus easily...
sacha4you (April 4, 2008 at 11:02 pm)
3. These are electron pairs in bosonic state, coupled together. This is not only a special quantum state of matter, but these electron pairs behave like super-electrons. (Read a book about CM quantum physics to learn more about) Now you can 'amplifiy' Einstein's gravitomagnetic effect by a couple of
magnitudes. The exact mechnism is fully covered in EHT (Extended HEIM Theory), an incomplete, but experimentally well supported multidimensional quantum theory. Now the thing is engineerable. ;-))
sacha4you (April 4, 2008 at 10:50 pm)
2. 'Normal' electrons are near useless, since they obey fermionic statistics, hence they can only be energetically stable in mutual exclusive shell positions (Pauli's exclusion principle) To make artificial gravity, you have to circumvent this barrier
by 'turning' electrons into bosonic state, where there can take any energetic state. Condensed matter is the magic term here. Gravitomagnetic London Moment (not to confuse with the classical magnetic London moment) uses Cooper pairs.
sacha4you (April 4, 2008 at 10:45 pm)
marcos13af, centripetal force (to call it right) is indeed artificial gravity. It's a Newtonian force (Lex II F=ma) that gives NO net interaction with other systems. Non-newtonian artificial gravity interacts with other distant system (Repulsion or attraction)
Gravitomagnetic London moment is NOT a trivial thing. (Newton were terrified, when he saw, his apple can accelerate upwards). However, electrons play indeed a role in gravitation, but another you think.
marcos13af (April 4, 2008 at 3:13 am)
We can create artificial gravity by centrifugal force too,and I'm not doing reference about this point,but it has something familiar...Gravity is associate with electrons...Einstein worked all his life,trying to unify the whole theory,but let me ask you,why did he fail?
London Moment is like rediscover "an apple aways fall,or 1+1=2".I prefer to understand about Thermodynamics...
I'm not trying to confront you mr. sacha4you,I only see the things different,I respect your beliefs and knowledge...
sacha4you (April 2, 2008 at 8:33 am)
Marcos13af, you're very quick with bla bla bla: The first derivative from angular velocity w to a reference frame of a metallic SC creates further the desired strong gravitomagnetic London moment. Since dw/dt=alfa, angular acceleration is the magic term, that creates the desired artificial gravitation vector. There is no interpretation required.
This is simply a scaled up quantum coupling effect based on condensed matter theory. (Member atoms of CM behaves like a single super atom) That's all.
marcos13af (April 2, 2008 at 1:02 am)
"A rotating superconductor produces a magnetic field proportional to its angular velocity bla...bla...bla...I know that...But how can you do the right interpretation(?)if you don't know the main principle?!I can be crazy,or not!!! Maybe I'm 10 years before everyone!!!Mr. sacha4you...
sacha4you (April 1, 2008 at 1:26 am)
marcos13af, pollution free energy generation (in what ever form you need) is NOT a technical, but a political (economical) question. E.g. Sandia developped the first working desktop sized EHT z-pinch fusion reactor delivering about 100MW electrical power. (Google for '+Sandia +"Linear transformer driver" +LTD' to get all papers).
However U.S. congress lobbyist torpedoe the
project continously, since it's very bad for
oil and coal business. Thorium technology is already dead due this. ;-)) |
