|
CEast (June 5, 2008 at 5:40 am)
He was considered a "rookie" for several years cause he never pitched the innings needed in any year to be deemed out of that. He still pitched for them for 3 or 4 years and sucked every time.
David5Wright (June 4, 2008 at 10:51 pm)
Mets Should Try To Acquire This Kid
555dominos (May 27, 2008 at 4:18 am)
throws straight gas.
shibman1103 (May 25, 2008 at 10:54 pm)
The Reds got Ednison Volquez and a younger, not as fine tuned pitcher named Herrera for Hamilton. Queto has the more electric stuff but he has a problem with the long ball, like most young pitchers with killer stuff, but Edinson has better command and presence.
bearsncubs11ssc (May 24, 2008 at 11:31 pm)
Is that who u got 4 Josh, or was it Quedo??
ninty07 (May 11, 2008 at 7:54 pm)
Uh the reds didn't need Josh Hamilton they already had 5 out fielders that were good, they needed a pitcher Oh yeah and uh do you realize he was a rookie when he played for the rangers now he isn't.
chuy020 (May 8, 2008 at 6:44 pm)
wow i can see all of you guys are reds fans just wait until this idiot breaks down just like he did with us (texas Rangers) you will be wishing for a return of hamilton but you aint getting one bwaaaaah suckers.
dmb426 (May 2, 2008 at 2:08 pm)
you got it wrong there, cuetos 1 and 2 pitches are better, his problem is he cant throw that change up, thats why hes given up so many hrs. volquez has a 4 seamer, 2 seamer, plus changeup, slider, and curve
daddykong1 (May 1, 2008 at 5:29 am)
i just dropped cueto for jurgens .... volquez is way bettter!!!!!!!!!!!
bosoxnorx (April 28, 2008 at 11:25 pm)
all you guys got caught up in that cueto hype you didnt know about the real talent coming to the reds |