|
modernmariorc (August 20, 2008 at 4:47 am)
and now Bush is going after New York Times reporters with CRIMINAL investigation, threatening to put reporters in Federal prison and etc.
combatphotog21 (August 20, 2008 at 3:39 am)
its not in the constitution, its in the Bill of Rights.
Trotskista90 (August 19, 2008 at 7:29 pm)
Me encanta este viejales, chomsky forever XD
damoninsky (August 18, 2008 at 7:23 am)
What he means is that freedom of speech didn't really exist until the 20th century (especially the 60's). It was in the 1st amendment, but only utilized when public movements took hold and got the justice system involved to recognize it. Before these movements, freedom of speech was the same as in other countries...only now has this country become unique (due to the activist movements).
SupportPBS (August 16, 2008 at 4:17 pm)
So? I love how you mention it like its a scientifically proven evil. I guess noam, the publishing houses and stores that sell his many books are run like communes with no self-interest to make money. Why doesn't chomsky publish online for free? getting the word out is second to money making? BTW PBS does this. And MIT has an endowment of 10 billion. I guess penny drives and not corporate gifts are responsible for that. And most PBS funding is public, corporate gifts are relatively minor.
stinkittodaman (August 16, 2008 at 3:44 pm)
YOU want to debate with chomsky? lololol! id pay to see it! he would massacre you.
yassinbh (August 16, 2008 at 5:33 am)
I thought feedom of speech was in the fist amendment of the Constition. I'm confused... can anyone explain why Chomsky said it was not in the Constitution?
dpape32 (August 15, 2008 at 5:13 pm)
Sorry to say, PBS is corporate funded too.
dpape32 (August 15, 2008 at 5:07 pm)
You clearly have never read anything by Chomsky. You have NO idea what your talking about.
krammitAll (August 13, 2008 at 5:45 am)
I think it would be best if you took some of your meds, but I assume wont so... please... continue.
Your psychosis is almost poetic. |
