|
undeadpresident (September 30, 2008 at 2:54 pm)
Could you tell me some of these errors? I have a copy of the book, and would like to highlight them.
Lurking99 (August 15, 2008 at 11:50 pm)
Would someone please ask Mr. Tarpley WHY Scholars for 09/11 Truth (and Justice) uses an ILLUMINATI SYMBOL as their logo?
I read Tarpley's 09/11: Synthetic Terror, and it was FULL of errors which are (unfortunately) repeated by Truthers to this day.
Tarpley was a FULBRIGHT SCHOLAR, which is a GLOBALIST (read: Illuminati) program similar to RHODES scholarship.
I KNOW that 09/11 was an inside job, but in light of above I will NEVER trust the "Scholars," especially Tarpley.
gosciu555 (June 24, 2008 at 6:17 am)
cause they signed it, then later came back and said they didn't or they forged the documents when they didn't.
gosciu555 (June 24, 2008 at 6:16 am)
its a complete red herring.
tgwIIIno1 (June 3, 2008 at 11:48 pm)
I worry that this plane VS noplane stuff is a red herring......Bombs in the buildings (1 2) and the phone calls are all peripheral matters and the real questions are where was the air force, why do the videos show a strange protrusion emmitted flash JUST prior to contact Where are ALL the videos of Pentagon strike Why did Hayden destroy the interrogations tapes and finally, why were air controllers tapes destroyed?? Isn't that enough?? Keep up your MUCH NEEDED scrutiny Webster!!!
damouno (April 6, 2008 at 5:54 am)
too bad ole 'Webster' simply wont discuss this 'Hot-Button' issue. I am finding that i can convince 'most' people about 9/11 being false flag event once i show + PROVE TV Fakery as a given..something which all of "Webster" lectures can never do..that is convince people about 9/11
damouno (April 6, 2008 at 5:53 am)
I agree with U 100% Sir...TV Fakery is ridiculed on Mainstream Media(MSM) as "NO PLANER" Theories. That is a LIE..TV Fakery does not say that "Nothing hit the TOWERS" It just says that what was shown BOEING 737 hitting WTC#2 is a FAKE..A C.G.I image(1 LIVE CLIP) + artifical cartoons(pretty clips)
damouno (March 23, 2008 at 3:20 am)
I think so (could be) Webster T (agent!? I hope it is not so..he not talking about TV-FAKERY which is almost self-evident (No BOEINGS hit TWIN TOWERS!!) also use of Direct energy weapons(D.E.W) also Webster has not 'DENOUNCED" Alex or Steven JONES as Frauds and disinfo-agents YET!! He has disillusioned me badly ! (But Hey GOOD LECTURE-He knows his history) too bad its irrelevent to 9/11 REAL TRUTH!!
chrispyt77 (March 11, 2008 at 3:22 pm)
Why did Webster accuse so many people over the kennebunkport signing? It's not sporting to attack people with ad hominems.
They all report that they signed a different document - one pro impeachment article, not an article attesting to the veracity of the kennebunkport warning.
Name calling smears us all.
markdcarter (January 22, 2008 at 7:05 am)
Some TV fakery does not prove "no planes". It merely proves some TV fakery.
That there were some perps on the inside does not prove that there were no perps on the outside. It merely proves that there were some perps on the inside.
Dualistic thinking is a trap. Pray avoid it! |
