|
bootlegtattoo (August 19, 2008 at 2:20 am)
i dont care if they were warned of if they did or didnt have jobs or drugs this is still fucked up, either way they are homeless, even if they moved to another spot the cops would just want them to move from there as well. this is a sick state of mind the cops have why dont they try to find them a home or a vacant building to put the tents in or something other than cutting up the tent
tanpisto (August 17, 2008 at 11:28 am)
the broke st pete police is full of cock sucking lyin whores for cops. i got my car forfeited because the cop said i had a stolen cellphone! $15,000 car forefeited over a $150 cellphone? no drugs, but a cellphone! charges we're dropped but the pieces of shit st pete police still proceeded with a civil case and took my vehicle. talk about a civil liberties violation! fuck you officer mullinex i hope die slow and burn in hell. greedy broke bitch!
Gamingtrevor (August 15, 2008 at 1:56 pm)
I live in St. Petersburg, FL, so please don't discredit my observations. The city has many places for these homeless to go, including The Salvation Army, right in the middle of town on 66th. They stand on the major intersections (Especially in Tyrone), and beg for money everyday, with a new sign stating a new problem. I work for a company that CATCHES them stealing, and when they are searched, have HUNDREDS of dollars on person. They are all liars, cheats, and need to get jobs and start over
Joyriser (August 14, 2008 at 6:32 pm)
Ok I dont know the full facts but cutting up tents is far too extreme! They could have loaded them on a truck to be reclaimed at a later date on payment of any fines. Those people must be there for a reason and if it is a drugs/homeless issue then where is the help for them to relocate.Anyone these days can end up in a tent and I want to see decent approach to moving people on if absolutely necessary
HBCUBands01 (August 14, 2008 at 5:44 am)
No you do not know the full story. The city gave them enough time to remove the tents. Over 50% of the people that lived their have jobs and most likely by drugs. The city codes does not allow them to have tents on sidewalks like that, so they were allowed to take the tents after they refused to leave.
HBCUBands01 (August 14, 2008 at 5:44 am)
No you do not know the full story. The city gave them enough time to remove the tents. Over 50% of the people that lived their have jobs. The city codes does not allow them to have tents on sidewalks like that, so they were allowed to take the tents after they refused to leave.
HBCUBands01 (August 14, 2008 at 5:42 am)
No you do not know the full story. The city gave them enough time to remove the tents. Over 50% of the people that lived their have jobs. The city codes does not allow them to have tents on sidewalks like that, so they were allowed to take the tents after they refused to leave.
HBCUBands01 (August 14, 2008 at 5:42 am)
No you do not know the full story. The city gave them enough time to remove the tents. Over 50% of the people that lived their have jobs. The city codes does not allow them to have tents on sidewalks like that, so they were allowed to take the tents after they refused to leave.
bonooooo5 (August 10, 2008 at 5:50 am)
thats so fucked up
if u were a cop, or president or WHATEVER, who would u rather get rid of, homeless people who dont pay taxes, or ileagles who came here and dont pay taxes? the homeless CANT support themselves, so they cant pay taxes, ileagles have a choice to come here...
thetammkids (August 10, 2008 at 3:15 am)
thats not right their people to |
