bjnboy (August 21, 2008 at 3:32 pm)

JW's are nearly as bad as "The Family/ Children of God " cult with this child molestation issue. You know what two Witnesses told me at my door when I told them about this? They not only denied it but stated: "They (the victims) have to pay! Not us!"

De5054 (August 4, 2008 at 3:16 pm)

Two. And it is an evidence that Jehovah's Witnesses swamp this (and other) websites, when they are specifically told not to get into internet websites, discussion with apostate like people, or debate forums, AT ALL!, and they do it. Quite strenuously too. & Repeatedly. JWs are not just evil and bad & dangerous. They are stupid. And they are disobedient to their own bosses who they support with ranting. Behind their back. If they can settle in court quietly ......

De5054 (August 4, 2008 at 3:09 pm)

ONE I've spoken to all 3 of those people you mention. I know for a fact that they are not good people. I say that in the weightiest of terms. And i don't care if your post was marked by forum users as spam, or given a down-thumb. I don't know you, but i do know those bent fuckers, and i know them for what they are. And i know that they know that i know it. The fact people mark your posts for to be concealed is evidence (an evidence) that there is commentary that they don't want heard.

De5054 (August 4, 2008 at 2:56 pm)

How can you not discuss details of something that didn't take place.? Eh.? It is a stipulated condition from the Jehovah's Witnesses' lawyers to a court for victims of something that did not happen, not to discuss any details of something that did not happen.? Is this like The Matrix or something where Neo slides back into a television screen of himself that is on the wall that's full of television screens of himself waiting to slide into the next screen shot of himself.? Shut up money?

De5054 (August 4, 2008 at 2:46 pm)

Why would a person or corporation "settle" but NOT acknowledge wrongdoing.? 9 lawsuits.? Is this a legal piss-take thing that i don't get.? They had records of paedophiles since the 1970s.!? And it is a 'sin' & not a crime.? Why pay out money - on the proviso that no-one discusses the specifics - if there is no wrongdoing? If they are NOT guilty.? Laodicean. Because you are neither hot nor cold i am going to spit you out of my mouth. Search Michael Porter England/elder/pedophile.

fishingjunks (July 12, 2008 at 11:07 am)

These paedophiles just continue, and those that speak out against it, like bill bowen are kicked out..where is the truth, where is the justice. Claus Uecker wrote about fucking, strangling and having sex with kids..and he is still walking free. I received news too about John mackenzie and colin Lang in Inverness and their reign of sexual terror...as far back as 1984, they are still waliking free. So how is it the love of God to let such things go on? they say its because Satan rules the world??

TiredOfjwHypocrites (June 18, 2008 at 9:26 am)

The fact remains that they settled out of court. If I was innocent I would never settle for anything but a public apology and a complete vindication of my name. I would then go after them with a libel and or slander case. No, they have been covering it up and knew they would lose in court.

TiredOfjwHypocrites (June 18, 2008 at 9:23 am)

Who is misleading the public? The NBC Anchor? The Judge?

fishingjunks (May 15, 2008 at 12:46 pm)

So, if these people live near you:Claus Uecker David Bennett Ray Llewellyn Colin Lang John McKenzie Malcolm Maclaren George Pickett Be very wary, protect your kids, go to the authorities, that is why they are there, but sooner or later these perverts will receive their just reward, and the bible even says woe to those twisting Gods word (Gal 1:8 revelation 22:18) Paul says even if we should declare somthing else other than the good news....twisting Gods word, isnt that not doing bad?

brinjen72 (April 24, 2008 at 9:22 pm)

Just like your doing. Why do elders try to get out of testifying in these types of cases. Pretend this video was about any religion other than Jehovah's Witnesses, what would your response be then?