mddtcn (October 13, 2008 at 8:01 am)

FUCK MAN I know. But hey, do u want to watch TV on ur PC You'll get all the SKY CHANNELS there is AND from any country IN THE WORLD, on your pc screen!!!! Go to this website... frexis.*com/PCTV21.html (DELETE the *) check it out................its cool, i've got it myself.

NFSGamerUSA (October 13, 2008 at 6:42 am)

You totally didn't catch the sarcasm, and I thought I made it quite obvious. I was making fun of the ricer I responded to.

jsalsita4u (October 13, 2008 at 5:50 am)

Not bad for a ricer, 4 gerbils vs american muscle!! Pathetic muscle car, even it being a close race is retarded. Sure you could do this and that to the v8, but just shut up, this is the race, these are the cars , and 4 gerbils on top this time. Start grieving muscle lovers/ricer haters/tuner haters.

piotrekzdunek777 (October 13, 2008 at 3:39 am)

1.)Is much lighter 2.)Parts are much cheaper 3.)Can haul practically as much horsepower. 4.)Much,much better on gas. 5.)Obviously more rare, you don't see many preludes on the road as you do shity mustangs. 6.)Preludes are much sexier, and preferred by the experienced driver. 7.)Preludes are more reliable. 8.)Aren't made by americans. 9.)Preludes sound more swift and sporty, mustangs sound like a monster coming through = gay. 10.)

piotrekzdunek777 (October 13, 2008 at 3:38 am)

So, in conclusion, what have you learned about the "Honda-Prelude" vs. the All american shity "mustang-ford?"

piotrekzdunek777 (October 13, 2008 at 3:32 am)

One version of the fifth-generation Prelude, the Type SH was equipped with the 2.2 l H22A, featuring VTEC and producing 223 hp (162 kW) @ 7200 rpm and 163 lb·fthe fifth generation curb weight was 1310 kg (2882 lb), and ground clearance was 140 mm (5.5 in

piotrekzdunek777 (October 13, 2008 at 3:28 am)

The standard 3.8 L V6, thanks to a new split-port induction system, now produced 190 hp (142 kW; 1999-2004)[24] while the Mustang GT's 4.6 L V8 saw an increase in output to 260 hp (194 kW; 1999-2004), thanks to a new head design and other enhancements. I TOLD YOU! atleast 6 cylinders, with ATLEAST a 3.0 liter engine, will GET UP POSSIBLY to 260 hp. otherwise, the mustang fucking sucks. even when it gets up to 260, its terrible on gas, and off the start is totally slow. ive race a saleenbefore

piotrekzdunek777 (October 13, 2008 at 3:27 am)

in your face buddy. all mustangs from the year 2000 up have atleast a 3.0 liter engine. they also haul like shit, and are terrible on gas. you have misinformation, but ur probably an amateur so im not gunna make fun of u for it. and the prelude does not have 200 hp, it has 223 my prelude SH 2001. (mine has more bc of stock and intake). Heres the evidence u mustang arsehole.

piotrekzdunek777 (October 13, 2008 at 3:25 am)

Though initially used in the 1994 and 1995 Mustang GT, Ford retired the Windsor 302 cu in (4.9 L) overhead-valve small-block V8 after nearly 40 years of use, replacing it with the newer Modular 4.6 L (281 cid) SOHC V8 in the 1996 Mustang GT. The 4.6 L V8 was initially rated at 215 hp (160 kW; 1996-1997) but was later increased to 225 hp (168 kW; 1998).[23]

piotrekzdunek777 (October 13, 2008 at 3:25 am)

The base model came with a 3.8 L OHV V6 (232 cid) engine rated at 145 hp (108kW; 1994-1995) or 150 hp (112 kW; 1996-1998) and was mated to a standard 5-speed manual transmission or optional 4-speed automatic.