vulcanvisitor (July 26, 2008 at 2:56 am)

Go to vulcanvisitor!!!

LastCynicStanding (July 26, 2008 at 2:32 am)

The 600 witnesses including the owner of the hotel? It's funny how that guy just shut up after he wasted all that money on getting his tapes back.

USAFFEKC10 (July 26, 2008 at 1:42 am)

I'm going to believe the 600 witnesses over your still photograph any day.

USAFFEKC10 (July 26, 2008 at 1:39 am)

Wow, it never fails to amaze me how many conspiracy theories exist about this. But, the Pentagon theory takes the cake for me. These conspiracy types want you to look at a picture with spools of cable and some bomb-proof window that didn't break and draw the conclusion that a plane didn't hit the building. Do these people think the govt. brainwashed a gridlocked hwy full of approx 600 witnesses into lying about seeing a large jet crash into the pentagon? Really?!

neilzep (July 26, 2008 at 1:29 am)

Chukasia get medicated dork! Wasnt a inside job,we just our ass kicked by the radicals get over it war mongrel,paranoid douche bag.

Chukasia (July 26, 2008 at 12:29 am)

Next point. If showing you actual government participation is enough proof for YOU then I must ask how do you define government participation? Does a phone call to a friend who is in govt. fall into that category? How about emails, or letters, text messages? Government is not a single entity, but made up of very many little pieces and businesses. Therein lies the problem. It's difficult to put the pieces together.

Chukasia (July 26, 2008 at 12:23 am)

Who showed you the evidence? Media. Unless you were in ground zero and saw for yourself the steel structure, etc.. Which I'm sure you weren't. So we get our information from the same sources. Good. Next point. The evidence is being disputed. Facts are being disputed. History is still being disputed, which explains the many new edition of history books that come out every year in schools and in bookstores. History is not contain in one book, one author.

EdgemanLL2 (July 26, 2008 at 12:17 am)

So what? The same media said Gore won Florida, that the Sago Miners were found all alive, that Dewey defeated Truman, that United had a 3rd crash on 911. I Journalism is the first DRAFT if history. Thats why they refer to "early reports indicate" or "we are getting reports of" History and objective fact is not based on daily journaism

EdgemanLL2 (July 26, 2008 at 12:15 am)

So you can use the past to guess at what the future might hold. But AFTER the event has passed, the ONLY measure of determination lay in the evidence. Not historical references. As such, IF it was an inside job "just asking questions" isnt proof." Telling me why you dont trust govt isnt proof. Telling me what you dont like about the official version is not proof. Showing actual govt participation IS the ONLY suitable proof.

Chukasia (July 26, 2008 at 12:13 am)

No. Actually the same media outlets that put out that a 757 hit the pentagon also put out that is wasn't. Im not sure which is right, but if our media outlets are contradicting each other, then you and I are both right and wrong. This isn't a theory since we both got our information from the same sources. Both arguments are rational. It's you that has decided a solution to the problem before all the facts are analyzed... in a rational way.