jedwards1211 (August 19, 2008 at 5:44 am)

Are you talking about the fact that when we look into a person's eyes, we think we are looking into their being? Hard to put into words, but hopefully you know what I mean. We associate others' minds with their eyes. But you're not saying we do just because in English "I" and "eye" are homophones, are you? I think that would be too far-fetched...I think it's just because people can make eye contact and achieve direct, continuous communication that way.

moyno85 (June 25, 2008 at 5:07 am)

wtf. stop this pretentious nonsense

theelwins (June 23, 2008 at 3:08 am)

haha cool

jcornelius84 (June 4, 2008 at 2:03 am)

wow that's super-crazy good job!

wonderwallmusic (April 11, 2008 at 2:03 am)

no not yet chief calm down don't get ahead of yourself

KDAWGx7777777 (March 29, 2008 at 9:21 pm)

that was a nice 420..............!

tylernol4 (March 14, 2008 at 2:51 pm)

I (eye) see. English is a very interesting language that way. It would be neat to know the Japanese connotations of this homophone.

razvan1980 (March 14, 2008 at 2:00 pm)

Funnily enough I was reffering to the sound of the word "eye" or rather the pronunciaction of that same word which fits on a tonal concordance with the word I. In other words, the I is the same as the eye. fact which confuses our conscious when it comes to the visual and the sense of the ego. That's what I meant, but if you had it to put it that way, well, then is exactly as you said it is friendo.

tylernol4 (March 14, 2008 at 12:48 pm)

Without the "I", how would "you" "see" that indeed there are "eyes" which can "see" "us"? "It seems that I know that I know. What I would like to see; is the I that knows me, when I know that I know that I know." - Unknown

mpontmercy (March 12, 2008 at 6:24 am)

The day you will learn a foreign language, then it'll happen.