shanedk (October 3, 2008 at 1:48 am)

No, NOT as filmed in a studio, because as I pointed out when you do speed it up to make the fall 1G, the arms move too fast! Gravity will only make a difference to vertical motion. The other movements give you the confirmation that, yes, this is indeed in a 1/6th-G environment.

yourlpc (October 3, 2008 at 1:12 am)

Know what? You speed it up and they all fall at 1G... hahaha... as expected if it were filmed in a studio... All stupid hoax claimers always think it's a proof but think about it for a sec, it is not a proof that the video was not taken on the moon either. It is just a confirmation of Newton laws.

ian2081 (September 27, 2008 at 12:34 pm)

how dare you use your heathen rational science to try and defy the obvious evidence of the half assed conspericy theories of the tinfoil hat people.

flyingaaron7 (September 26, 2008 at 6:13 pm)

good video. also if u look at videos of the moon rover rippin around u will notice the dust kicked up from the tyres creates a perfect parabola; which is only possible in a vacuum. we landed on the moon. plus why would they fake it 6 times!

keriscorp (September 22, 2008 at 9:59 pm)

SHANEDK said "No, stupid, the pack HAS A MASS OF 70kg! YOU DO NOT MEASURE WEIGHT IN KILOGRAMS!!!" you dont??? i do. europe does. russia does. chinese do. they weigh things on scale...in kilograms. so i guess were all stupid...and youre smart. now arent you? smart boy....VERY smart. ill let the rest of the world know you said they cant weigh things in kilograms anymore. that should upset the colombian cartels...what with all those non-existent kilos they have lying around. BUWAAAHAAAHAAA!!!

keriscorp (September 22, 2008 at 9:53 pm)

the "astronaut" could do flips with 1/6th the effort required on the earth. thats pretty simple...and on the moon...it weighs 12 kg. 70kg = 154.323583 lbs divided by 6 = about 25 pounds. plus his body weight 200/6=33 gives the guy 58 pounds to move. DO YOU UNDERSTAND YET????

keriscorp (September 22, 2008 at 9:44 pm)

dude...mass is weight per volume, as in the mass of water is 1 kg per litre. thats a constant. the weight is a factor of gravity. an "earth" scale on the moon would say it weighs =/- 12kg. the mass is, of course, the same, but the gravity of the moon would NOT effect the scale with the same force, nor would the moons gravity require the same force to move the pack.require less FORCE to move it. THEREFORE...

shanedk (September 22, 2008 at 9:01 pm)

Here's some other stuff I said: "No, it's still 70kg. It's 70kg on Earth, 70kg on the moon, 70kg in 0-gravity space, EVERYWHERE--MASS DOES NOT CHANGE!!! And you STILL need to move that mass when you jump!" "Mass is mass. Mass NEVER changes." YOU are the one who said, ".that 70 kg pack...in moon weight that would be less that 12 kg" Nope, still 70kg!

shanedk (September 22, 2008 at 8:59 pm)

No, stupid, the pack HAS A MASS OF 70kg! YOU DO NOT MEASURE WEIGHT IN KILOGRAMS!!! It has a mass of 70kg, and in order to jump, or walk, or whatever, you have to provide enough force to move that 70kg of mass ("work" in physics terms). This is BASIC STUFF!!!

keriscorp (September 22, 2008 at 8:51 pm)

you said "Uh, yes he is! Remember he has a 70kg pack on!" the pack WEIGHS 70 kilos. weighs. get it? so that is NOT exactly what you said, and every time you comment, it seems to be an embarrassing thing for you. poor soul. that would make you a...what....liar?